Discrete choice experiments to analyze the quality of service in freight transport
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
To determine the level of satisfaction of freight services, users jointly assess several attributes that represent different aspects of the level of service. From a methodological point of view, the research tríes te tind the weights with which individuals evaluate these attributes vvithin vvhat is considered the level of satisfaction or utility. Te achieve these objectives, the analysis focuses on obtaining preferences using discrete choice experiments or stated preference (PD),With this information we can estimate discrete choice models, which allow us te get a representation of the utility function from which you can obtain a measure of the overall quality of service and the willingness to pay for improvements in it, Test resulta represent valuadle tecla to guide policy when shipping.
Downloads
Article Details
Con la finalidad de contar con un tipo de licencia más abierta en el espectro que ofrece Creative Commons, a partir de diciembre de 2022 desde el número 27, AXIOMA asume la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Tanto el sitio web como los artículos en sus diferentes formatos, reflejan esta información.
Hasta el mes de noviembre de 2022 con el número 26, la revista AXIOMA asumió una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Los artículos contenidos en cada número hasta el 26, cuentan con esta licencia y su descripción se conserva en el portal de nuestra revista.
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
CC BY-NC-ND
AXIOMA- Revista Científica de Investigación, Docencia y Proyección Social
References
Bliemer, M.C.J. & Rose, J.M. (2006, August). Designing stated choice experirnents: state-of-the-art. Paper presentad at the 11th International conference en Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto: Japan
Choice Metrics (2009). Ngene 1.0. User manual & reference guide. The Cutting Edge in Experimental Designa. Retrieved from http://www.choice-metrics.com
Cook, W. D. & Kress, M. (1988). European Journal of Operational Research, Deriving Weights from pairwise cornparisons ratio matrices: an axiomatic approach, 37, 355-362.
Domencich, T & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban Travel Dernand: A Behavioural Analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam
Engel, J.F, Blackwell, R.D. & Miniard, P.W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. Forth Worth, TAC: The Dryden Press
Garrido, R. A. & Ortúzar, J. de D. (1994). Journal of the Cperational Research Society, 45 (10), 1099-1107. Deriving public transport level of service weights from multiple comparison of latent and observable variables.
Hensher, D.A. (2000). A service quality index for area¬wide contract performance assessment for commercial bus contracts. lnstitute of Transport Studies. The University of Sydney.
Hensher. D.A. (2002a). Urban public transport delivery in Australia: issues and challenges in retaining and growing patronage. lnstitute of Transpon Studies. The University of Sydney
Hensher, D.A. (2002b). Contract arcas and integrated fares for public transit provision. lnstitute of Transport Studies. The University of Sydney.
Hensher, D.A. & Houghton E, (2002). Growth atter transition under performance-based contracts, lnstitute Qf Transport Studies. The University of Sydney.
Hensher, D.A. & Houghton, E. (2004), Performance-based quality contracts for the bus sector: delivering social and commercial value for money. Transportation Research Part B, 38, 123-146.
Hensher, D.A. & Prioni, P. (2002). A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment regime. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36(1), 93-113.
Hensher, D.A,, Stopher, P. & Buliock, P. (2003). Service quality-developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transportador Research Pan' A, 37, 499-517.
Huber, J. & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance and efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (August), 307-317.
Kanninen, B.J. (2002). Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 39(May), 214-217.
Keeney, R. & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manski, C. (1977). The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decision. 8, 229-254.
McFadden, D. (1974). The measureiment of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303-328.
Ortúzar, J. de D. & Willumsen, L.G. (1994). Modelling Transport (2nd ed,). Chichester : John Wiley & Sons.
Rose, J.M. & Bliemer, M.C.J. (2008). Stated preferente experimental design strategies. In D. A. Hensher y K. J. Button (eds.), Handbook of Transport Modelling (ch. 8, pp. 151-180). Oxford: Elsevier.
Rose, J.M. & Bliemer, M.C.J. (2009). Gonstructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs. Transport Reviews, 29(5), 587-617.
Sandor, Z. & Wedel, M. (2002). Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science, 21(4), 455-475.
Winston, C. (1983). The demand for freight transportation: models and applications. Transportation Research Part A, 17(6), 419-427.