Key factors in the design of sound science policies for universities

Main Article Content

Luis B. Ramos Sánchez
Hilda Oquendo Ferrer

Abstract

The scientific policy of a university is very important for increasíng the efficiency and effectiveness of its socioeconomic impact. There are severa) factors to be taken into account for a proper design of these policies. These factors belong to the internal and externa' environment of universities. The aire of this paper is to analyze the main factors that determine internal policies that must be adopted in order to correctly lead scientific research at the university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramos SánchezL. B., & Oquendo FerrerH. (2012). Key factors in the design of sound science policies for universities. AXIOMA, 1(8), 36-43. Retrieved from https://axioma.pucesi.edu.ec/index.php/axioma/article/view/364
Section
DOCENCIA
Author Biographies

Luis B. Ramos Sánchez, Universidad de Camagüey-Cuba.

Departamento de Ingeniería Química

Hilda Oquendo Ferrer, Universidad de Camagüey

Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado

References

BBSRC, (2005). BBSRC Economic Impact Reporting Framework (pp. 1-23), Londres: BBSRS.
BBSRC. (2008). BBSRC Delivery Plan 2008-2011. Londres: BBSRC
Berends, H., Bij, H. van der, Debackere, K,, &Weggeman, M. (2006). Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research. R&D Management 37, 85-95,
Codd, J. (1988). The construct/on and deconstruction of education policy documents, Journal of educational policy, 3(3), 235-248
Czerniewicz, Laura, & Brown, Cheryl. (2009). A study of the relationship between institucional policy, organisational culture and e-leaming use in Tour South African universities. Computers & Education, 53, 121-131
de-Rassenfosse, Gaetan, & de-la-Potterie, Bruno van¬Pottelsberghe. (2009). A policy insight ¡rito the R&D¬patent relationship. Research Policy 38, 779-792.
Editorial. (2009), Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview. Research Policy 38, 571-582.
Fernández-Zayas, José LUIS, & Zúñiga-Bello, Patricia. (2006). Diagnóstico de la política científica, tecnológica y de fomento a la innovación en México (2000-2006) (1 ed.). México: Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico.
Garmendia, José María Beraza, & Castellanos, Arturo Rodríguez. (2007). La Evolución de la Misión de la Universidad. Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas(14). 25-56.
Giuliani, Elisa, & Arza, Valeria. (2009). What dríves the forn-lation of lvaluablej university-industry iinkages? lnsights from the wine industry. Research Policy, 38, 906-921.
Liu, Feng-chao, Simon, Denis Fred, Sun, Yu-tao, & Cao, Cong. (2011). China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Reserch Policy 40 917- 931.
Lundvall, B. A., & Borrás, S, (2005). Science, technology and innovation policy. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of innovation (pp. 599-631). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martínez-Fuentes, J., Galluty, A. J. Meroño, & Ríos-Díaz, J. (2010). El factor de impacto como criterio para la evaluación de la producción y la calidad científica Rey lberoarn Fisioter kinesiol, 13(1), 29-36.
Niedergassel, Benjamin, & JensLeker. (2011). Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists Technovation 31, 142-150.
Palumbo, Riccardo, & Berardino, Daniela Di. (2010), Scientific network and performance of human resources: Evidence from Italian University in Chemistry field. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 5304-5312.
Pareja, Ignacio Velez, & G., Ricardo Davila L. De. (1984). De la Investigación Universitaria en Colombia. Educación Superior y Desarrollo, 3(1, Ene-mar), 48-54.
Ponomariov, Branco L., & Boardman, R Craig. ( 2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39 613-624.
Portuondo-Padrón, Roberto, Basulto-Morales, Carlos, & Gómez-Pérez, Alonso (Eds.). (2004). Didáctica para Escuelas Preparatorias: Universidad de Camagüey
Sagasti, F. (1989). Science and technology policy research for development: an overview and some priorities from a Latin American perspectiva. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 9, 50-60
San-Román, Antonio Pulido. (2006). Investigación, innovación y universidad en la nueva sociedad del conocimiento. Encuentros Multidisciplinares, 22(Eriero-abril), 1-7. Retrieved from www.encuentros¬multidisciplinares.org/Index,htm website:
SIR. (2011). Ranking Iberoamericano SIR 2011. Retrieved from http://~.scimagolab.corn Tarapanoff. Kira. (1992). A política científica e tecnológica no Brasil.- o papel do IBICT. Ci. live., Brasília, 21(2)(mayo-agosto), 149-158
Ynalvez, Marcus Antonius, & Shrum, Wesley M. (2011). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy, 40, 204-216.