Interesse de graduados do ensino médio equatoriano em estudar novos cursos universitários nas modalidades aberta e à distância

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Ximena V. Jaramillo
Mercedes A. Villa
Mario V. Paguay

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar o interesse dos estudantes equatorianos em realizar novas ofertas acadêmicas nas modalidades Aberta e a Distância na Universidade Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL). Este foi um estudo quantitativo, não experimental-descritivo, ex post-facto. Foi aplicado um questionário online, que foi respondido por 650 alunos de diferentes escolas de ensino médio de todo o país. Os resultados mostram que, atualmente, os concluintes do ensino médio equatorianos têm uma preferência maior por cursos tradicionais, em salas de aula tradicionais, do que por novos cursos a distância. Com base nos resultados deste estudo, conclui-se que, no Equador, ainda existe a necessidade de promover entre os egressos do ensino médio novas ofertas acadêmicas que atendam à atual demanda global, bem como, novas e modernas metodologias de ensino por meio de Open e Educação a distância que, de forma alternativa, permite o acesso a uma educação de qualidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Como Citar
JaramilloX. V., VillaM. A., & PaguayM. V. (2019). Interesse de graduados do ensino médio equatoriano em estudar novos cursos universitários nas modalidades aberta e à distância. AXIOMA, (20), 35-43. Recuperado de https://axioma.pucesi.edu.ec/index.php/axioma/article/view/558
Seção
INVESTIGACIÓN
Biografia do Autor

Ximena V. Jaramillo, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja

Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Departamento de Química y Ciencias Exactas, Loja-Ecuador

Referências

Berberoğlu, B. (2015). Open and Distance Education Programs of Anadolu University Since the Establishment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3358–3365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.1004
Büyükbaykal, C. I. (2015). Communication Technologies and Education in the Information Age. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 636–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.594
Caliskan, S., Suzek, S., y Ozcan, D. (2017). Determining student satisfaction in distance education courses. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2017.11.275
Çelen, F. K., Çelik, A., y Seferoğlu, S. S. (2013). Analysis of Teachers’Approaches to Distance Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.06.076
Consejo Nacional de Planificación. (2017). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2017-2021. Quito. Retrieved from http://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/10/PNBV-26-OCT-FINAL_0K.compressed1.pdf
DePoy, E., Gitlin, L. N., DePoy, E., y Gitlin, L. N. (2016). Experimental-Type Designs. Introduction to Research, 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-26171-5.00010-0
Fischman, G. E., y Ott, M. (2018). Access, equity and quality trends in Latin America’s public universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2016.11.002
Groenwald, S. L. (2018). The challenges and opportunities in leading a multi-campus university. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROFNURS.2017.12.005
Hammershøj, L. G. (2018). The perfect storm scenario for the university: Diagnosing converging tendencies in higher education. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURES.2018.06.001
Kaya, M. (2012). Distance education systems used in universities of Turkey and Northern Cyprus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 676–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.12.123
Koohang, A. (2009). A learner-centred model for blended learning design. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2009.021685
Kutluk, F. A., y Gulmez, M. (2012). A Research about Distance Education Students’ Satisfaction with Education Quality at an Accounting Program. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2733–2737. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.05.556
Matt, P.-A. (2017). Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 81, 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJAR.2016.11.003
Medvedeva, T. A. (2015). University Education: The Challenges of 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.12.547
Milman, N. B. (2015). Distance Education. International Encyclopedia of the Social y Behavioral Sciences, 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92001-4
Ministerio de Educación. (2018). AMIE (Estadísticas educativas a partir de 2009-2010). Retrieved May 10, 2019, from https://educacion.gob.ec/amie/
Moreno, O., y Cárdenas, M. G. (2012). Educación a distancia: nueva modalidad, nuevos alumnos. Perfiles de alumnos de Psicología en México. Perfiles Educativos, 34(136), 118–136. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S0185-26982012000200008
Nguyen, D. (2018). The university in a world of digital technologies: Tensions and challenges. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2018.05.012
Samigulina, G., y Samigulina, Z. (2016). Intelligent System of Distance Education of Engineers, Based on Modern Innovative Technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.07.034
Semradova, I., y Hubackova, S. (2016). Teacher Responsibility in Distance Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 544–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.02.042
Silva-Smith, A. L., Traylor, C., Ostovich, D., George, J., y Smith, N. (2016). Regulation of Distance Nursing Education Programs: One University’s Experience. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(2), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(16)31076-6
Sukrawan, Y., Soemarto, y Komaro, M. (2018). Blended learning development for vocational education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434, 012262. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012262